|
Friday, October 27, 2006
Engagament Metric
Robert Scoble writes:
Innovation Report
Knowledge@Wharton has a special report: "As companies struggle to innovate in today's competitive environment, they need to continually guard against adding to their "clutter" -- the creeping impact of complexity on efficiency and cost-competitiveness. In this three-part special report, experts from Wharton and George Group Consulting discuss how management can approach this problem by thinking "ambidextrously" -- that is, focusing on innovation and broad exploration while minimizing the impact of clutter on operational processes and costs. Also, in the accompanying podcast (with transcript), Mike McCallister, CEO of Humana, discusses balancing innovation and complexity in the health care industry with Wharton management professor Michael Useem and Stephen Wilson, engagement director in George Group's Conquering Complexity practice."
MySpace and Facebook Challenges
WSJ writes:
Web 2.0 Success
Steve Rubel puts it together into a forumla -- Relationships + Profits = Web 2.0 Success -- based on an article by Colin Stewart.
Mobile Value Shifting
MEX writes:
TECH TALK: Good Books: In Spite of the Gods
Let us move on from world history to a brief history of the New India. Our guide is Edward Luce, the former South Asia bureau chief of the Financial Times. Luce’s book is about “the strange rise of modern India.” The title is a bit weird at first glance: “In Spite of the Gods.” But if one looks past that, it is an insightful book about what has changed (and is changing) in India. Sometimes, those of us who are on the ground in India, cannot easily understand these changes. An outsider’s perspective is what Luce brings in – and does it very well. Here is a brief about the book from Random House:
Early on in the book, Luce writes about the ultimate Indian fascination – the village. He rips apart those who talk of trying to keep villages the way they are, and comes out in favour of urbanization. In an interview with The Hindu, he had this to say: “There is a very strong and deeply rooted cultural romanticism about the village in India. It's primarily upper caste urban people who are the keepers of the flame of this romanticism. I want India to develop and development means urbanisation. It is an inescapable fact. I don't believe that urbanisation means liquidation of culture. France is 90 per cent urban. France is quintessentially French. India has a great urban civilisational heritage. It's not as if India's cradle of culture is purely the village. But partly because of the distortions of the colonial era and partly because — and this is not an original point I'm making — the villages are the least tainted and least interfered with by the colonial presence, the village became the repository in the freedom movement dialectic of Indian culture. That romanticism — which I think is very conservative — is still quite widespread. It is not stopping India urbanising but it's making the urban experience far more callous and bloody than it could be. Urbanisation can be done well. It can be anticipated. Demographic trends can be projected and you can start putting infrastructure in place without having to be Japanese.” Reading this reminded me of my colleague, Atanu Dey, and his ideas about RISC (Rural Infrastructure and Services Commons). It was nice to see an echo in Luce’s thinking. Next Week: Good Books (continued)
Tech Talk
| PermaLink
| Comments (2)
Having lived and worked in the rural area one does not deny the fact that there is not too much to romanticise about the rural milieu.However I disagree with the notion that the only alternative is traditional urbanisation. In the Indian context it is just not feasible to shift 70% of the population away from the rural areas - or even shift them away from agriculture. Technology exists that can make Indian villages viable and sustainable in their current context - and parts of it has actualy ben tried out. A key ingredient in that is broadband connectivity which is seeping into the districts and will soon cover our villages. If you travel in the 'rural' areas of the USA you will find towns -self sustaining and viable with populations of less than 500. There is really no reason why Indian villages cannot be made viable as most of them have very high unrealised potential. Kerala is probably a very good example of how rural urbanisation can happen without losing its rural charm. It is a model for the rest of India can work towards. The hordes of foreign tourists that throng Kerala is a vindication of the viabiliy of the concept from one angle. If Kerala is blessed with natural resources almost every state in India has unique selling propositions. Posted by Joseph K AntonyIndia is blessed with natural resources compare to any country in the world. So its very true that no reason for indian villages can't be made viable. |