|
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
Mumbai Blasts
The past week has been a tough one for Mumbai. First, the rains. Then, Sunday's actions by the Shiv Sena in response to the alleged desecration of a statue of their leader's late wife. Finally, yesterday, the series of bomb blasts. I was in the car en route to drop a friend to the airport when I heard one of the blasts. It was 100-odd metres away from us as we were passing Matunga station. We did not realise it at that time - the horror of what had happened dawned an hour or so later. I managed to drop my friend to the airport, and reached home late at night. Mobiles were not working for the most part -- only a couple calls got through. SMSes were long delayed or were simply failing. What was working fine - amazingly - was the mobile internet (via GPRS) on my phone. I sent emails through our mobile mail service to colleagues at work and family at home. I hate to say it but today's urban life is going to see terror and other bad events happening. One has to live with this reality. The question is how can we best react when these things happen.
The Long Tail
The Economist reviews Chris Anderson's book:
Wired has an excerpt from the book.
Click Fraud Problem
SFGate writes:
Search Engines
| PermaLink
| Comments (1)
I guess it is not fair to blame revenue loss in online advertising using statistics that is compilable at its own peril. Every form of advertising has its own limitations and advertisers are losing money directly or indirectly. If at all they could count the loss it might have been much more than this. Selling comb to a bald in a TV ad is an indirect revenue loss. Can advertisers find out how much they are losing out there? Not to mention those who change their channels even if they are not bald. There are 2 important aspects for which internet advertising still makes much more sense in revenue utilization for advertising than any other media (while the companies are fighting to curb click frauds): This may not be true for all the businesses of course. But a vast majority of it would still agree. I feel collecting the statistics on the effectiveness of the total revenue spent = good + evil (click frauds for online ads) in advertising would give more plesant results. As far as this evil is a least % of good in above formula, I feel internet advertising makes much more sense than any other form because of the said two reasons. I guess it would be difficult for any service (not only Google) to completely curb click frauds but it can certainly be brought down to a great extent. In my opinion, companies should try to see the effectiveness rathar than direct/indirect or to say computable/incomputable losses in revenue spent in advertising. Posted by Goldy
Mobile Messaging
C. Enrique Ortiz writes:
Software
| PermaLink
| Comments (1)
I have spent some time thinking about this particular topic. I feel that till we have maturity in the smartphone os where applications built by third party developers can be widely deployed and work ;-) We are better off with XHTML based/SMS based messaging and interfaces. The network operator will play a key role as he is the "server side" intelligence in absence of a uniform client base of phones.
Networked Journalism
Jeff Jarvis writes:
BlogStreet
| PermaLink
| Comments (1)
Networked Journalism has become quite popular in my home country, too. For instance, one big newspaper offers their readers to be reporters, to write stories and even take pictures. Of course the readers are paid for their services. This concept has become quite popular and lot's of citizens are participating. Posted by Kylie M. Lee
TECH TALK: Video on the Internet: The Technology
Esther Dyson’s Release 1.0 last year laid out the challenges:
It is now easy for an individual to put video on the Internet and share it with others. For content owners wanting to put up a digital storefront, the challenges are greater. One needs to worry about digital rights management to ensure that the content is protected. Encoding needs to be at a very good quality so that users are satisfied enough to pay for it. Decisions about pricing are always tricky. How long can users keep content if they download it? Or should streaming be the only option? In addition, bandwidth for video is still not cheap enough to be ignored from the equation. Finally, money needs to be collected. We have faced a host of similar issues in Rajshri Media (a company I have invested in) as we seek to build a broadband portal. From our reading and understanding, I have concluded that there are three ways to do video over the Internet. The first is via IPTV, which requires the telco to provide a set-top box. The second is the approach used by companies like YouTube, Brightcove and Entriq which deliver video directly to the browser using a plug-in. The third is to use P2P distribution networks like BitTorrent. Tomorrow: Set-Top Box Related Entries: [All]TECH TALK: Video on the Internet: A Personal View [July 21, 2006] TECH TALK: Video on the Internet: The Indian Opportunity [July 20, 2006] TECH TALK: Video on the Internet: PCCW [July 19, 2006] TECH TALK: Video on the Internet: Business Models [July 18, 2006] TECH TALK: Video on the Internet: P2P [July 17, 2006]
Tech Talk
| PermaLink
| Comments (1)
It's cool site please visit our site.http://www.tristatemeds.com |
Rajesh,
The blog is well read so sending out this message:
Blood is required by all major hospitals in Mumbai. Check out
http://indianblooddonors.com/
Thanks,
Posted by AkshayAkshay Mishra
I agree we have to face the reality of global terrorism, Mother Nature’s wrath and selfish politicians and learn to live with them. However, what is not acceptable is the lack of preparedness that we see in our cities. Mumbai went through hell in 1993 (bomb blasts) and last year (unprecedented rains), but are we better prepared now? Sadly, no. :(
Posted by Kunnath SanthoshHi Rajesh,
Question to be asked is - "Are India's telecom providers really geared up for emergencies?" Everytime an emergency occurs, their networks get jammed. Whether it is rains like last year or terrorist attacks, phone networks do have a tendancy of getting jammed at the drop of a hat. This creates more confusion and panic in people.
With phone companies revenues per user dropping down everyday (Rs 999 and incoming free for life), I dont think they are geared to improve the quality of their infrastructure as well. For e.g. even on "normal" days cell phone shows a "full" signal strength and the calls still do not go through.
The industry is betting big on WiMAX. Going further to this post: http://www.emergic.org/archives/2006/07/10/index.html#cringely_on_wimax I am not sure whether WiMAX will help resolve bandwidth related issues the providers face.
Communications has a major role to play in preparedness, quashing rumours, passing on important information, etc. I think TRAI should play a major role in terms of making service providers guarantee "x" amount of bandwidth for voice traffic. I am not sure whether we match up to international standards on the average voice traffic bandwidth.
Another disconcerting fact when these kind of things happen is related to the news channels. Instead of helping they seem to sensationalise things and create panic which is fuelled further by the jamming of phone networks.
Vivek
Posted by VivekVivek, brings up a great point. This is the same issue that the FCC has been battling with in the United States. For a country that emphasizes so much on emergency calling and public services, USA has its major share of woes on providing enough capacity for callers to reach others/911 during emergencies like what we had in Mumbai.
The challenge with this is two field..One, the spectrum and the other network availability. There are a few solutions for problem one...But for problem two, unless the regulatory authority comes down hard on the carriers, there is no other way. From a carrier point of view, its build as less as possible and make more.... Are the FCC's and the TRAI's of the world listening????????
Posted by Shankar Subramanian