|
Saturday, April 23, 2005
The Art of Packing
WSJ has a column by Jeremy Wagstaff on how to pack for travel:
Technology and Development
Atanu Dey writes:
India's IT and Outsourcing Industries
The Economist writes:
Emerging Markets
| PermaLink
| Comments (7)
Mr Rajesh, do you really believe in what Economist has to say? Increased money in a local economy leads to inflation is a well known fact. These BPO's do the lowly back end processing; cyber coolism is a new phenomenon. They are air conditioned sweat shops backed by greedy enterpreneurs and swinging monkeys;NASSCOM. I really wonder whether BPO centres in Bangalore realise as to what they have done to the socio economic set up of that city. No wonder that Kannada associations were protesting against the influx of outsiders from the state staffing these centres; the influx of North Indians is generally resented. The local people have generally been given the boot. North karnataka offers a study in contrast. Behind the glitz of Bangalore that makes the headlines, abject poverty and farmer suicides strike you up in north- a picture of lopsided development. This maybe at variance with vested interests who feel that by proclaiming the growth of companies like these really makes India an IT superpower. Step outside Bangalore and you would see abject failure of Public Distribution systems there. Of course the infrastructure bottleneck. The fact is that Bangalore provides a ready place for poaching the trained workforce. Thats natural as it shaves off the cost. With high attrition rates of almost 50-60% because of unnatural work hours, it is a grave medical risk. I really wonder whether we get to see "Call Centre Syndrome" down the line- the long term affects of sleep deprivation and unnatural sleep cycles in adults. NASSCOM and Economist are ready to ignore these realities. Plus of course. I really wonder as to how they arrived at those estimates- "billions of dollars pouring in India being good for this country". Blatant lies repeated many times over dont become truth. Dear Dr Abhishek Puri, Dr Puri, I agree that BPOs are sweatshops and not rocket science but is there a better alternative. India with all this population has to have a industry which is labour intensive. Without BPO we might end up like Africa. I also believe (as Atanu Dey advises) manufacturing & agricultural sector has to kick in and complement the services industry so that people have food to eat. You are worried about Inflation whereas I am worried about unemployed youth and poverty. (also your statement "Increased money leads to inflation" is not suitable here.) Do you mean we shun those BPO jobs and sit idle ? Its kind of shocking to hear statements from Indians ourselves. I would expected these statements from a Westerner who had lost his job to a Indian (and I understand his situation) Oh, these kannada rights are coz of shortsightedness and anger misdirected. Its not because of other state people entering bangalore that its in such a pitiable state, its simple because the govt sits idle without improving infrastructre. Try giving your argument to Dr. Jagdish Bagawati. Posted by NavinI d agree that BPO's are not printing money. By that same logic it is a juvenile argument. The only point I want assert here is that as the local economies go for a toss, the ones with meagre sources of income are the hardest hit. To me it seems to be perfectly logical to conclude the same. I am sure that Economists would be in a better position to explain that. My only grouse is that behind the glitz and the media hoopla, there are a large number of people who assume that BPO is one way to riches; fact remains that no one takes this as a career option. The biggies like NASSCOM draw their sustenance from these outfits. Beyond that they have no relevance per se. The facts are stark. As jobs shift in the rural America, undue reliance on these BPO's in the long run would hurt us more than anything else. The facts. Mphasis, despite it's fancy security accreditions had swindling employees. Any more incidents like these and everything goes in for a toss. As attrition rates goes up, higher salaries are one way out. This erodes the cost differential factor that initially attracted hordes towards India. The shift of jobs is likely to other destinations with less priveleged populations. I mean there is no justification for such a huge cost differential for the same work being done in US or India. Why are we paid less as compared to the dingbat in US? How can as an Indian swallow this? Then the all famous Gartner study which says that percieved benefits over cost savings by outsourcing are not there. In the long run, it works almost the same. I see a trend in media which proclaims that BPO industry in India is "maturing". One last contentious issue. Most of the MNC's don't have loyalty towards the host countries. If the outsourcing debate catches up with a feverish pitch among the western audiences, they would simply find it useful to move back. Have they given any kind of gurantees that they would not do so? Not that I am aware of. In that event how would you face the unemployment problem resulting thereof? Posted by Dr Abhishek PuriDr Puri, Your quote :" If the outsourcing debate catches up with a feverish pitch among the western audiences, they(MNCs) would simply find it useful to move back". If they move back, they lose the competitive edge to Indian vendors and will run the risk of going out of business. The cost factor will not be a major headache (as some Gartner Studies predict). We recently discussed this in Brad's Weblog. Let take a practical case. A BPO person on an average gets paid 10K USD and the vendor might charge the client 25K USD. If there is a cost pressure the vendors will take the hit and the industry will not go bust easily. i.e, if the employee cost goes from 10K USD to 15K USD the vendor will cut his profit margins and not try to push the escalating costs to the client to remain competitive (and in business). The bottom line is, the (greedy) vendors (both MNCs and Indian) will ensure the industry stays here and alive. All the above three wont happen easily as the vendors will go out of business first, and believe me they do everything they can to stay in business. In an earlier post, I had taken Peter Drucker's famous statement "I never predict. I just look out the window and see what’s visible — but not yet seen," and applied it to the future of the BPO industry. Looking at the visible, but unseen aspects of the BPO boom, I think there is an opportunity waiting to be seized. The first person to tap into the pool of BPO employees to improve existing businesses or to build new businesses could be onto something. See my post at http://prayatna.typepad.com/satya/2003/12/call_centre_emp.html for more on the visible, but unseen aspects of the BPO boom and ideas for new businesses tapping into the BPO employees. Posted by SatyaIt's cool site please visit our site.http://www.tristatemeds.com |
On a lighter note, in the technology industry, we call it "over-engineering" the stuff ;)
Posted by Kshitij ChandanNostalgia isn't what it used to be .....
I remember doing all that was mentioned in para 1 till I got a serious drubbing and insights into organised packing by a friend while on a countrywide tripping. Since then, it is one lesson I have never forgotten and has since paid in rich dividends.
Simple things line like shapes consume lesser volumes.. hosiery items and socks and kerchiefs can squeeze themselves anywhere.. The end result is that it all fits well and with lesser time effort and less stress levels as well... Teaching the same to my better half has helped also... I am going on a trip next week and our travel bags are duly getting done as well... Rich dividends indeed..
People do not realise the benefits so much.. It is very essential to know this info.. thanks for highlighting to one and all... Maybe there is some universal gyaan in it as well when we extend it to our office desks, cupboards or wardrobes, financial planning etc..
Posted by Krishna IyerPeter Drucker pointed out in his book "Innovation and Entrepreurship" that the
"container" saved the dying freight shipping industry in the 1950s.
The shipping industry tried hard to increase the ships' speeds and to lower their fuel consumption, but the real costs did not come from doing work (that is, being at sea) but from not doing work (that is, sitting idle in port) for loading and unloading of cargo, clogging the ports and slowing turnaround.
The adoption of the "container" (which had already been in use by in the railroad and trucking industries) not only saved the shipping industry but turned it into a major growth industry.
A reviewer on Amazon describes Drucker's point well - The [container] could be pre-loaded on land before the ship arrived. The pre-loaded container could then quickly be loaded onto the ship when the ship arrived in port. This made ocean transit much more cost effective and efficient. Drucker notes that the big cost of ocean transit was having ships held up in port, effectively tying up a capital asset without being able to utilize its full earnings capability.
The proposed packing model is a variation of the shipping container model
Posted by Satya