|
Tuesday, March 8, 2005
Do One or Two Things Really Well
Dave Pollard writes: "If you want to make a difference in this world, you need to know yourself, to perfect what you do well until you're brilliant at it, to focus your energies, and to show others courageously that nobody does it better."
Global Handset Sales
WSJ writes about the continued astonishing sales growth in mobile phones:
CNN adds: "Growth in emerging markets would continue as the mobile phone market is expected to hit 2 billion subscribers some time this year, up from 1.7 billion by late 2004. The challenge is to sell to people who cannot yet afford mobile telephony...Motorola has announced it will produce a handset for less than $40 later this year to address that market."
Homestead QuickSites
Robert Scoble points out that QuickSites won the DemoGod award at DEMO. BloggingDEMO adds: "Homestead Quicksites is a template-based web site creation service that allows average folks to produce high-quality web sites in a matter of minutes."
Odeo and Podcasting
The New York Times writes about what Evan Williams (who co-founded Blogger) is doing next:
Personal Media Aggregator
Robin Good writes: "Personal Media Aggregators are the road to create instant-vertical-communities by way of becoming fulcrum points around which news, commentary, discussion, and networking opportunities around a very specific topic, brand, celebrity or writer can become a cohesive aggregating force."
Google's Power
Paul Allen outlines 7 reasons why Google will rule the world: - Google Philosophy
TECH TALK: The Future of Search: What’s Changing
There have been three versions of search engines in the Internet’s first mass-usage decade. The first “search” was actually Yahoo’s directory – with sites handpicked by editors. This was fine until the number of websites weren’t very large. As the Web grew, the limitations of the directory approach became apparent. Along came Altavista – which used a crawler to get web pages and run indexing algorithms on them. This allowed for keyword-based searching. This era lasted a while until smart webmasters figured out ways to get their pages to show up in the top of the results list by artificially inserting words into their pages. This problem was addressed to a significant extent when Google launched its search engine using PageRank technology which ranked pages based on incoming links – a measure of authority. This immediately improved the relevance of the results. While there have been some incremental modifications, for the most part, the PageRank technology serves as the base on which most of today’s leading search engines have been built. From Yahoo to Altavista to Google, the focus has been on providing the most relevant results in the quickest possible time to information-hungry users. In the five years or so since Google’s launch, there have been plenty of new developments in the world and Web around us. As we think of next-generation search, it is important to understand the changing nature of information and usage so we can build up a new model which can then help provide insights into the characteristics of next-generation search engines. The five most important developments in recent times have been: user-generated content, RSS, mobile phones, broadband and internationalisation. We will look at each of these. 1. User-Generated Content For much of our history, content has been created by few for consumption by many. This has been because access to the tools for content creation and mechanisms of distribution have been limited. The Internet changed the economics of distribution – anyone could use its global reach to disseminate content. But the tools for content creation were still not easy for mass-market usage. That has now started to change. Beginning with do-it-yourself publishing via weblogs to image capture via digital cameras and mobile phones, new content is now being created by millions. While the earlier model was that of a “few creating for many”, it is now “many creating for few.” The blog that I create or the photos that you take may be limited to only a very small set of people – but they are people who are important to us. The latest meme in user-generated content is Podcasting. The New York Times wrote recently: “[P]odcast [is] a kind of recording that, thanks to a technology barely six months old, anyone can make on a computer and then post to a Web site, where it can be downloaded to an iPod or any MP3 player to be played at the listener's leisure…Podcasts are a little like reality television, a little like ‘Wayne's World,’ and are often likened to TiVo, which allows television watchers to download only the programs they want to watch and to skip advertising, for radio or blogs but spoken…And as bloggers have influenced journalism, podcasters have the potential to transform radio.” Another interesting bottom-up example of user-generated content is the tagging that sites like Del.icio.us and Flickr are supporting. Users can tag any kind of content and then share it with others. Micro Persuasion wrote: "Tags are a natural complement to search because they empower users to create structures that organize unstructured consumer-generated media.” Tomorrow: What’s Changing (continued) Related Entries: [All]TECH TALK: The Future of Search: Memex [April 8, 2005] TECH TALK: The Future of Search: Information Marketplaces [April 7, 2005] TECH TALK: The Future of Search: The Wider View [April 6, 2005] TECH TALK: The Future of Search: MyToday [April 5, 2005] TECH TALK: The Future of Search: RSS to OPML [April 4, 2005]
|
Rajesh,
Just my 2 cents. A lot of us are like that. Spreading ourselves thin. But even if carpet bombing is not the best idiom of strategy, multiple interests give you a lot of cross-area skills. I have a computer science degree and practice law (patents), but I find a lot of programming skills are portable to law.
Regards,
Posted by HasitHasit
Hi,
Posted by SheetalRemember the age old saying...
"Jack of all trade master of none"...
The 'cluster fly' behaves as it does due to its narrow specilization. It is not equiped to handle something new (like being trapped in a room) as it can do only one or two things very well ! The ability to do one or two things very well is important and the point is taken. However overspecialization (a result of a narrow focus) will have the same results, unless the external environment remains static (which we all know is not possible). For anyone to conquer his or her environment, the ability to do one or two things very well *must* be supplemented by the ability to do a lot of other things at least passably to survive. My take on today's adage :)
shiv
Posted by Shiv