|
Monday, March 29, 2004
Why Skype is No Different
Om Malik has an article by Aswath Rao providing an alternate view of Skype, the P2P VoIP company: "Skype shares the same functional architecture with other VoIP providers. It shares the same business plan and outlook. But they have artificially cloaked it in a proprietary system. I guess this is their “economic moat” to use a Buffett term. From a consumer point of view, the beauty of VoIP is that there is no moat and current technology is sufficient to realize direct IP Communications that does not require any intermediation." Related Entries: [All]
Friedman's New World
Thomas Friedman writes about what he'd like to wake up and read in the morning:
What would you like to wake up and read?
General
| PermaLink
| Comments (3)
I want to wake up and read that : "Thomas Friedman wants US support to Israel totally withdrawn to make this world a better place to live" Posted by ShyamHi friends, Digressing here a bit....I wish to wake up and live my life to the fullest potential each moment! Cheers,
X1 for Hard Disk Search
Walter Mossberg writes:
Search Engines
| PermaLink
| Comments (3)
mac has had a similar software, launchbar, for over a year. although launchbar doesn't search through email text, it matches your keyword with files/contacts/application/bookmarks on your hard disk. Posted by pakiyaHi, nice work, if you have the necessary time, please vistit me, you'll find interesting stuff, articles about men health. Posted by penis enlargementCialis - Erectile Dysfunction Cialis
HP Revvs Up
Barron's writes on HP's progress two years after it merged with Compaq:
I was among those who was skeptical about HP's future after the merger. Nice to be proved wrong!
Blogging and Calendaring
Michael Sippey has an interesting experiment with his Timeline (example):
This is a small part of an idea Ramesh Jain has talked about - the EventWeb.
Visual Programming
Phil Windley points to a post by Sean McGrath, who says: "Visual programming is largely pointless as long as the predominant programming paradigm remains imperative logic. Now, switch to a data flow oriented, SOA world and visual programming makes a lot more sense in my opinion. Picture logistics infrastructures. Picture aviation hubs. Picture model railways. Now imagine business folk constructing visual models of how their data flows through messaging pipes and hubs and flows through data transforming 'services'.... Once we switch paradigm from algorithm-centric (programmer friendly) to data-centric (business friendly), we can start to talk the same language and - irony of ironies - this type of "talking" is much easier to visualize." Adds Phil: "Sean McGrath has a tough time seeing the case for visual programming languages in a predominantly imperative programming model. I think he's on the mark. But Sean thinks SOA will change this. This is already true, to some extent. Several of the Web services intermediary products I've reviewed recently use visual prgramming tools, notably Grand Central Communications and CommerceOne's Conductor." We want to create a visual programming environment for business process with our Visual Biz-ic, which is currently under development.
TECH TALK: As India Develops: ICT
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have been the dominant factor for the productivity growth in the developed markets. The problem with the current ICT is their cost – the dollar-denominated pricing makes it affordable to only a small segment of the business and consumer segment in India. While competition has ensured that talk on cellphones is now among the cheapest in India, the same is not the case in computing given that two virtual monopolies (Intel and Microsoft) control the two most critical components. For India to develop, there is an increasing emphasis on the need to build out the physical infrastructure – roads, ports, airports, power and the like. But there is the need for a parallel digital infrastructure – high-speed networks, access terminals, software and content. While the telecom carriers are now building out the high-speed networks, not enough attention has been paid in the other areas. This needs to change. What India needs is an affordable computing and communications platform, one that dramatically brings down the cost without compromising on the performance or utility. Luckily, many of the components are now coming together to make this happen. What is needed is for us to adopt these innovations to build the equivalent of “tech utilities” which make “commputing” (as Om Malik put it) a reality for the next markets. The connectivity front is an easier problem to address, thanks to competition, the tens of thousands of optical fibre that have been laid across India, and technologies like WLL, DSL and WiFi which can help bridge the last mile. The challenge lies on the computing front. Consider India and its present installed base of 10 million computers. In the next 12 months, that figure is expected to rise by about 4.5 million. But it is still not good enough. India needs a much faster adoption of computing technology. There is a potential for 100 million computers in the next few years – 3 million SMEs need an average of 10 computers each (30 million), 40 million Indian homes need one each (40 million), 1 million Indian schools need 10 each (10 million), 100,000 colleges need 100 each (10 million), and rural areas and the government need 5 million each. These are the next markets for computing. While it is tantalising to think of the cellphone as the computer (or perhaps “commputer”), in reality, portability and mobility is a requirement for only a small segment of the markets. The display size and the limited data entry capabilities of the cellphone make it more useful as a “last-mile, always-on bridge” rather than the primary computational device. We still need the desktop computer – but at a fraction of today’s price points. In some segments, we can consider using the TV as a display, but a refurbished monitor costs about the same and gives a much better resolution. In short, what India needs is a next-generation computing platform for today’s non-consumers, which makes affordability as its primary objective, and at the same time leverages the plethora of software and content that is already available. Think thin clients, server-centric computing and open-source software. Tomorrow: ICT (Part 2) Related Entries: [All]
|
Skype carries the MIT brand name and recently secured some million dollar funding/contract by a company that sells headphones. Concept of VoIP has been around for quite long. Check out speakfreely.org (now discontinued), DialPad, MediaRing and other major apps are based on the SpeakFreely API.
Posted by Anurag PhadkeNow only if I had the MIT brand name, some of my so-called-original ideas would be fetching me some good VC funding.
:)
-Anurag