Monday, February 9, 2004
Learning from the Best Leaders

[via Shrikant Patil] From a Knowledge@Wharton article on what we can learn from the 25 most influential leaders of our time:


If there is one trait that each of these leaders shares, it is tenacity. Unlike so-called serial entrepreneurs who cash out of their companies after a few years and move on to their next venture, these leaders have had a long-term vision. They have been willing to ride out the lows with the highs. This willingness to slog it out and stay in the game for the long haul has been reflected as much in the success of their enterprises as in the endurance of their own influence as leaders. Asked why he never left Intel to start another company, Grove recently replied: "Intel is like a river. It changes every day and behind every bend there is a new start, a new challenge. I cannot think of any place where I would rather have worked."

Entrepreneurship | PermaLink | Comments (2)

Just went through the article. Beautiful!!

Cheers,
D.

Posted by Dhar

Hi, nice work, if you have the necessary time, please vistit me, you'll find interesting stuff, articles about men health.

Posted by penis enlargement
Biology and Technology Convergence

Wired has a series of stories entitled "Living Machines":


We're beginning to discern life processes at their fundamental level, and as we re-create these processes in silico, we're starting to see how they work in inorganic settings. It turns out that many of life's properties - emergence, self-organization, reproduction, coevolution - show up in systems generally regarded as nonliving.

EMERGENCE describes the way unpredictable patterns arise from innumerable interactions between independent parts. An organism's behavior, for instance, is driven by the interplay of its cells. Similarly, weather develops from the mixing of oxygen, carbon dioxide, water, and other molecules.

SELF-ORGANIZATION is a basic emergent behavior. Plants and animals assemble and regulate themselves independent of any hierarchy for planning or management. Digital simulations made up of numerous software agents have demonstrated self-organization in systems ranging from computer networks to tornadoes.

REPRODUCTION was considered strictly the purview of organisms until recently. Now computer programs procreate, too. Genetic algorithms mimic biology's capacity for innovation through genetic recombination and replication, shuffling 1s and 0s the way nature does DNA's Gs, Ts, As, and Cs, then reproducing the best code for further recombination. This technique has been used to evolve everything from factory schedules to jet engines.

COEVOLUTION inevitably accompanies evolution. When an organism evolves in response to environmental change, it puts new pressures on that environment, which likewise evolves, prompting further evolution in the organism. This cycle occurs in many social systems - for instance, the interaction between behavioral norms and legal codes.

These life properties are already being built into real-world devices, like Sony's robotic dog Aibo; put two of them together and their personalities will coevolve. The line between organisms and machines is beginning to blur.

Search Engine Technology

Andy Beal writes about search engines and interviews Microsoft's Robert Scoble.

An idea from Andy: "Google has the technology to really take advantage of search within email. Why else would it even consider entering this arena? Imagine that, in order to use a free Google email account, you allow Google to provide advertisements and track your email activities. Google could change the way that search results and ads are displayed to free email users. For example, let's say you receive an email from your brother, the content of which, among other things, gloats about the brand new P4 desktop computer that they just purchased from Dell. As part of the interface you use to read that email, Google magically displays paid search advertising for desktop computers, including a link that will take you directly to the appropriate page on Dell.com. This information would be quite beneficial to you, as you may be interested in seeing how you too can be a proud owner of a P4 computer. Fantastic targeted advertising for Dell, as they know that if you click on the listing, they are halfway there to converting you into another satisfied customer...This idea is so much closer to reality than you may think. Google already has the advertisers with its AdWords service boasting 150,000 users, eager to spend their advertising dollars. It also has the technology to determine which results to show you within your email interface. Google's AdSense can provide the contextual ad technology that would scan an email's content to determine which ads are the most relevant to display."

Scoble: "For Internet searches, I see social behavior analysis tools like Technorati becoming far more important. Why? Because people want different ways to see potentially relevant results. Google took us a long way toward that future as their Google's results are strongly influenced by how many inbound links a site has. But, now, let's go further, even further than Technorati has gone. Let's identify who really is keeping the market up to date on a certain field and give him/her more weight...I also see that search engines that search just specific types of content (like Feedster) are going to be more important (Feedster only searches RSS and Atom syndication feeds)...Oh, and users are going to demand new ways of exporting searches. Google showed us that with News Alerts. Enter in a search term, like 'Microsoft' and get emailed anytime a news source mentions Microsoft. Feedster goes further than that. There you can build an RSS feed from a search term. I have several of those coming into my RSS News Aggregator and find they are invaluable for watching what the weblogs are saying about your product, company, or market. For instance, one of my terms I built a feed for is "WinFS" -- I'll be watching to see how many people link to this article and if any of you have something interesting to say I'll even link back."

Search Engines | PermaLink | Comments (4)

One thing I don't understand is why things are so exciting if Google does them. Yahoo and Microsoft have millions of free email users and could easily add contextual ads next to email content. Why does Google have a magical quality that makes people salivate at the prospect of them doing something that anyone else could do with relatively little work?

Posted by anon

I have some doubts about how successful this will be. For one thing people have become so used to mentally not looking at the Ad-space right at the top of a browser, that it would be difficult for them to spot even Ads which are relevant to them.

For example, Google is already using this with Blogspot. A lot of my friends have their blogs on Blogspot and when I visit the blog, I somehow have mentally turned off my brain from looking at the 470x70 banner right at top. Same goes for Ads on the right hand side of Yahoo mail.

With such consumer apathy, do you think it is really a good strategy to try this approach?

Cheers,
Dhar

Posted by Dhar

Advertising costs money and that is exactly what Google is capitalising on. Apart from their technology there is nothing new about their Adwords and Adsense programs. What they are saying is "here take my 10 dollars and let your site members watch my advertisers' text messages." So is that any thing different from the conventional advertising methods ? Pay extra to a new paper publisher or a tv channel host and they will also insert an ad relevant to a specific target audience.

Google wants their members to use Google Email with the ads and they may even reward the user with micorpayments for every email sent or recieved. If the advertiser is willing to pay then its a win-win situation for everyone including Google.

But what we are forgeting is the key question- Does the viewer of the ads is having any interest to buy the product or service advertised? Actually this whole new information technology and search engines makes it possible for us to find that information when we want to and if we want to. Search engines are already achieving this kind of results by giving out clustered results. Probably we may see new search programs with more option fields like New cars, Used Cars, Cars for Hire etc by which we can get more specific information. There is absolutely no need to be the target of an advertising campaign to find out that information.

Posted by Rajan Urs

They might be using the same technology, but this is way different from Adwords and Adsense. When you submit search terms to Google, you're asking for information about a certain topic. Google spits back lots of information, including ads. But when you write someone an email, that's supposed to be private communication. I have no problem with Google targeting ads based on search words, but if they target ads based on the content of email messages, that's a violation of privacy.

Posted by Lionel Levine
Underhyped 802.11

William Gurley compares 802.11 with x86 and Ethernet and writes why it is the next big platform:


802.11 is to wireless communications what the x86 is to computing and what Ethernet is to networking. This "open-standard radio" is today supported by more than 115 vendors with more than 900 certified products. The collective R&D of Intel, Broadcom, Cisco Systems and Motorola, as well the entire venture capital community, will move this technology further and further along the price performance curve.

In five short years, a backwardly compatible 802.11g chip began to offer about 25 times the performance at about one-twentieth the price of the first-generation radios in this market. As before, these low price points are leading to increased market opportunities and lower and lower prices. Currently, 802.11 radios are a 50-million-unit-per-year market, but history suggests that this is merely the beginning.

With some 802.11 radio chips approaching $5 price points, Wi-Fi will likely be embedded in every electronic product under the sun. This pervasiveness will impact the communications market in two remarkable ways. First, vendors that build supporting infrastructure and applications will come to assume that Wi-Fi is onboard, further entrenching the standard. Perhaps more importantly, as a client technology, 802.11 will increasingly be considered "free."

In the wireless communications world, the cost of client technology (sometimes referred to as CPE, for consumer premises equipment) typically has a huge impact on overall system economics and therefore adoption. With "free" CPE, 802.11 will have a distinct competitive economic advantage.

802.11, or one of its backwardly compatible descendants, will dominate the wireless communications sector over the next 10 years the same way the x86 architecture dominates computing and that Ethernet dominates networking.

Digital Entertainment

The Economist writes: "thanks to the DVD and its ability to store a feature-length movie at high quality on a small disc, Hollywood now earns more money from home entertainment than from the showing of films in cinemas. In 2003, Americans spent $22.5 billion on DVDs and videocassettes compared with $9.2 billion at the box office, where receipts fell slightly for the first time in a decade...Sales and rentals of DVDs account for two-fifths of the studios' revenues, according to Adams Media Research, compared with under 1% in 1997...What is particularly exciting for the movie industry is that people are choosing to buy rather than rent DVDs, as they mostly did with videos."

This is yet another example of how industries are going digital. As the cost of DVD players has fallen to under USD 30, sales of DVDs have taken off, giving studios another lucrative franchise. Piracy remains the biggest threat. Says the Economist:


Hollywood is at the same euphoric stage with DVDs now as the music business was in the 1990s, when consumers bought CDs to replace their vinyl records. After that, piracy and internet-downloads struck and the music industry shrank. Video files are much bigger and can take many hours to download, which for a while offers some degree of protection. Nevertheless, having seen what happened to the music business, Roger Ames, chairman and chief executive of Warner Music Group, advises his colleagues in the film world to join big music's effort to sue individual consumers who download content illegally from the internet. Unless the studios get tough, he warns “They have no idea what's coming their way”.

Chips for TVs

A new market is opening up for the likes of Intel and Texas Instruments. Barron's has more:


The new angle on television involves microdisplays -- a technique for making rear-projection TVs that are cheaper and brighter than most large-screen digital sets sold today. Texas Instruments already reaps about 5% of its sales from its Digital Light Processing chip -- a half-inch square that contains as many as 2 million movable mirrors to project a high-definition image onto a TV screen. At a consumer electronics trade show last month, Intel described an emerging, rival technology called Liquid Crystal on Silicon -- call it LCOS. Instead of moving mirrors, the Intel approach bounces its image off a reflective chip covered with tiny liquid-crystal shutters.

Such microdisplay technologies are worth $300-$400 in component costs per TV set, Parker figures, plus an additional few hundred bucks for the projection parts. That boosts the semiconductor content of a digital TV from about $110 -- comparable to a cable set-top box -- to the $400-$500 per unit range of a personal computer. Unit sales of TVs in the U.S. surpassed 30 million in 2002, so it's clearly worth the attention of TI and Intel.

Federal regulations will require most TVs to contain digital tuners by 2007.

Other technologies used in big digital TVs form their image right on their expensive screens, which incorporate liquid-crystal shutters or else tiny jots of the glowing electrified gas known as plasma. Televisions using TI's little mirrors aren't as thin as a plasma screen, but they're cheaper. Intel hopes that its LCOS chips could ultimately be cheaper than TI's moving mirrors, because the Intel design has no moving parts.


Adds WSJ on Texas Instruments' digital light processing (DLP) chip:

After years of experimenting with a fingernail-size computer chip that holds a million or more microscopic mirrors, Texas Instruments Inc. is finally about to see the payoff -- and it may be in your living room. The Dallas chipmaker's "digital light processing" technology was little more than a dim prospect for many years. But now it is at the heart of new high-definition television sets from RCA, Samsung, Toshiba, Zenith Electronics and Panasonic, among others. Some analysts think DLP ultimately could be as ubiquitous as Dolby sound in stereos.

Today, the technology uses as many as two million mirrors. Light from a bulb first passes through red, blue or green filters, then is beamed onto the chip. The mirrors are tilted in rapid-fire sequence by electrical pulses to reflect the light, which creates tiny dots that are projected onto the TV screen.

Because each mirror produces a single picture element and reflects the light of a 200-watt bulb, the sets have ultrasharp images. Texas Instruments says the DLP images are brighter than those of liquid-crystal displays, and that DLP sets burn less energy than plasma screens, two other technologies for high-definition TV.

TECH TALK: Technology and the Indian Elections: Campaigning

We will examine how technology can influence elections in India from three angles: during the pre-polling stage (campaigning), during the results declaration stage (counting), and after the elections (governance). We will also look at the various entities that are involved in the elections – the candidates, the political parties, the constituents (voters), the media and the winners (government), and discuss how technology can help each of them.

The election process starts with the filing of nominations by various candidates. They are either affiliated to national or state political parties, or in some cases, contesting as Independents. One of the most important requirements for every candidate and political party should be to have a website. For the candidate, the website should provide a profile, wealth declaration of the candidate and the family, current legal and criminal cases (if any), position papers on various issues the candidate considers of important, and a calendar of events as part of the candidate’s campaign. In the event the candidate is an incumbent, the website should also provide details of the promises made in the previous election and the current status in the fulfillment process. For the political parties, the websites should have profiles of the party leadership, the party manifesto and a list of its candidates with links to the candidate profiles. In some ways, this is analogous to the filings and disclosures that the stock exchanges expect the companies that are listed to do.

In addition, as the campaign progresses, the candidate and party websites should provide updates on the speeches made – transcripts or audio/video recordings should be made available. It is also possible to provide pictures in near-real time with digital cameras and camera cellphones. Technology exists to easily record and upload files to the websites.

The organisation of the website can thus have two components – an “About Me/Us” section which provides the background, and a “What’s New” section which has a weblog-like look which showcases the recent events and developments. This section should also have an RSS feed to allow interested people to subscribe to the updates.

The next layer of information availability comes from aggregation. Each constituency should have a website which provides demographic information (which can be sourced from census data and the electoral lists), along with details of the contestants with links to their respective websites. In addition, there can be historical data, which shows the past winners, voting percentages and other statistics, which can found in the Election Commission archives. The information should be available both in HTML form on web page, as well as in database form for analysis by those wanting to delve deeper. This aggregated information allows citizens to easily find the information on the contestants and make informed choices. This will also help in ensuring more people turn out to vote – in most cases, the lack of desire to vote stems from ignorance of the candidates.

Tomorrow: Campaigning (continued)

Related Entries:  [All]
TECH TALK: Technology and the Indian Elections: Beyond 2004 [February 13, 2004]
TECH TALK: Technology and the Indian Elections: Governance [February 12, 2004]
TECH TALK: Technology and the Indian Elections: Counting [February 11, 2004]
TECH TALK: Technology and the Indian Elections: Key Technologies [February 6, 2004]
TECH TALK: Technology and the Indian Elections: Emergent Democracy [February 5, 2004]

Me
Entrepreneur, Mumbai, India, Emergic, Netcore, Internet, IndiaWorld, Sify, IIT-Bombay, ColumbiaUniv ... More [Write to Me]

- MyToday
- Emergic Ecosystem
- Netcore
- Emergic MailServ: Enterprise Messaging
- Emergic CleanMail: Anti-Virus, Anti-Spam
- BlogStreet: Blog Profiles, RSS Ecosystem
- Novatium: Network Computers
- SEraja: The EventWeb
- Rajshri Media: Broadband Portal
- Newsweek on Novatium (Feb 2007)
- Knowledge@Wharton Interview (Oct 2006)
- TIME Asia (Mar 2000)

Free SMS Updates
Indian mobile users can sms START EMERGIC to 9845398453 to get free daily updates on new additions. [To unsubscribe, sms STOP EMERGIC to 9845398453.]
My Writings
Affordable Computing and ICT for Development
India's Digital Infrastructure (May 2007)
Envisioning Tomorrow's World (Mar 2007)
Computing for the Next Billion (Jun 2006)
City Wi-Fi Networks (Apr 2006)
Microsoft Live (Nov 2005)
Internet Tea Leaves (Sep 2005)
Next-Generation Networks (Jul 2005)
Disruptions (Jul 2005)
The Mobile Phone Platform (Feb 2005)
Microsoft, Bandwidth and Centralised Computing (Jan 2005)
Computing for Broadband 101 (Jan 2005)
Tomorrow's World (Nov 2004)
CommPuting Grid (Nov 2004)
Massputers, Redux (Oct 2004)
The Network Computer (Oct 2004)
Reinventing Computing (Aug 2004)
Tech Trends (Jul 2004)
Letter to Arun Shourie (Apr 2004)
As India Develops (Mar 2004)
My Mental Model (Dec 2003)
The Next Billion (Sep 2003)
Transforming Rural India 2 (Jul 2003)
The Discovery of India (Jun 2003)
Transforming Rural India (Mar 2003)
The Rs 5,000 PC Ecosystem (Jan 2003)
Disruptive Bridges (Nov 2002)
India Post: Ideas for Tomorrow (Nov 2002)
Technology's Next Markets (Oct 2002)
Server-based Computing (Jul 2002)
India's Next Decade (Apr 2002)
The Digital Divide (Apr 2002)
The Real Wireless Revolution (Mar 2002)
Envisioning a New India (Jan 2002)
Emerging Technologies, Emerging Markets (Jan 2002)
The Indianised Linux Desktop (Nov 2001)
Mass Market Internet (Nov 2000)

Enterprise Software and SMEs
The Coming Age of ASPs (May 2005)
SMEs and Technology (Oct 2003)
The Death and Rebirth of Email (Aug 2003)
IT's Future (Aug 2003)
Rethinking the Desktop (Sep 2002)
Rethinking Enterprise Software (Jun 2002)
Emerging Enterprises and Emergent Networks (Mar 2002)
Web Services (Nov 2001)
Alt.Software (Oct 2001)
The Intelligent, Real-Time Enterprise (June 2001)
Enterprise Software (Mar 2001)
SME Tech Utility (Feb 2001)
Software and SMEs (Jan 2001)
The Intelligent Enterprise: Integrating CRM, SCM and EIP (Jan 2001)

Information Management
The Emerging Internet (May 2007)
The Now-New-Near Web (Sep 2006)
Mobile Internet (Aug 2006)
Video on the Internet (Jun 2006)
India Internet and Mobile (Feb 2006)
Rethinking Newspapers (Jan 2006)
Web 2.0 (Oct 2005)
The Future of Search (Mar 2005)
Web 2.0 Conference (Oct 2004)
Thinking A New Food Portal (Sep 2004)
Rethinking Search (Jan 2004)
India.com 2.0 (Jan 2004)
The Publish-Subscribe Web (Jun 2003)
Constructing the Memex (May 2003)
RSS, Blogs and Beyond (Feb 2003)
Blogging (Feb 2002)
Harnessing Information (Oct 2001)
News Refinery (May 2001)

Entrepreneurship
When Bad Things Happen (Jan 2007)
Ventures and Capital (Dec 2006)
15 Years as an Entrepreneur (Nov 2006)
Of Blue Oceans and Black Swans (May 2006)
Let's Build a Business (Apr 2006)
The Value of Vision (Mar 2006)
Vision and Worries (Oct 2005)
Bootstrapping a Business (Oct 2005)
India Needs More Entrepreneurs (Aug 2005)
Dotcom Nostalgia (Jun 2005)
When Things Go Wrong (Apr 2005)
My Life as an Entrepreneur (Nov 2004)
An Entrepreneur's Growth Challenge (Sep 2004)
Creating Options (Sep 2004)
From Employee to Entrepreneur (Aug 2004)
A Tale of Two Summers (Aug 2004)
Crucible Experiences (May 2004)
The Company (May 2004)
An Entrepreneur's Attributes (Nov 2003)
An Entrepreneur's Early Days (Sep 2003)
Reflections on Ideas and Entrepreneurship (Jul 2003)
Entrepreneur's Enigmas (Jan 2003)
The Entrepreneur's Delights (Sep 2002)
Life as an Entrepreneur (Oct 2001)
Leadership Lessons from Lagaan (Aug 2001)
Entrepreneurial Learnings (July 2001)
Entrepreneurship (Mar 2001)
The IndiaWorld Story (1997-8)

Abhishek (my son)
Photos
Letter to a Two-Year-Old (Apr 2007)
Father to Son (Apr 2006)
Letter to a 2005 Baby (Jun 2005)
The Making of Abhishek (Jul 2005)

Moreover
Facebook (May 2007)
Doing Education Right (May 2007)
Reflections from a Dubai Trip (Apr 2007)
Creating India's New Cities (Apr 2007)
India's Challenges (Mar 2007)
3GSM 2007 (Feb 2007)
Demo 2007 (Feb 2007)
A Tale of Two Covers (Feb 2007)
3GSM Mumbai (Feb 2007)
2007 Tech Trends (Jan 2007)
The Best of 2006 (Dec 2006)
Best of Tech Talk 2006 (Dec 2006)
Cyworld (Nov 2006)
Two 2.0 Events (Nov 2006)
Two-Sided Markets (Nov 2006)
The Rise of YouTube (Oct 2006)
Gandhigiri (Oct 2006)
Education and Reservation (May 2006)
Four Blog Years (May 2006)
Fooled by Randomness (May 2006)
Blue Ocean Strategy (May 2006)
Revolution on the Roads (Apr 2006)
The MySpace Story (Mar 2006)
A Presentation at PC Forum (Mar 2006)
Extreme Competition (Mar 2006)
3GSM World Congress 2006 (Feb 2006)
DEMO 2006 (Feb 2006)
India Rising (Jan 2006)
2006 Tech Trends (Jan 2006)
The Best of Tech Talk 2005 (Dec 2005)
The Best of 2005 (Dec 2005)
Trains, Planes and Mobiles (Dec 2005)
Peter Drucker: Management's Newton (Nov 2005)
India Empowered (Oct 2005)
Rajasthan Ruminations 2 (Sep 2005)
Building a Better India (Sep 2005)
South Korea's IT839 (Jul 2005)
Shift-Ctrl (Jul 2005)
Best of Future Tech (Feb 2005)
Multi-Model Minds (Feb 2005)
The Best of 2004 (Jan 2005)
On Watching Swades (Jan 2005)
The Best of Tech Talk 2004 (Dec 2004)
India Trends (Dec 2004)
An American Journey (Aug 2004)
Black Swans (Aug 2004)
A Train Journey (Jun 2004)
An Agenda for the Next Government (May 2004)
Two Blog Years (May 2004)
Rajasthan Ruminations (Feb 2004)
Technology and the Indian Elections (Feb 2004)
2003-04 (Dec 2003)
Random Musings (Sep 2003)
Useful Concepts (July 2003)
Dear Non-Resident Indian (July 2003)
Tech's 10X Tsunamis (July 2002)
An Indian in China (Mar 2002)
Disruptive Technologies (Aug 2001)
Innovation (Aug 2001)
Good Books

- My Business Standard columns
- More columns at Tech Samachar

Presentations
- TiE Bangalore (Dec 2004)
- BangaloreIT.com (Nov 2004)
- CIT 2004 (Jan 2004)
- BangaloreIT.com (Nov 2003)
- Pune CSI Open-Source Workshop (Sep 2003)
- Sydney ICT Workshop (Jul 2003)
- Netcore (Mar 2003)
- Emergent Democracy (MP Govt, Feb 2003)
- Vision for Digitally Bridged India (Dec 2002)
- India Post (Nov 2002)
- Open-Source for eGovernance (Oct 2002)
Recent Entries
Archives
BlogStreet
Syndicate
Powered by
Movable Type 2.21


Main - Feedback
© Rajesh Jain