|
Thursday, December 11, 2003
Brainpower is Getting Cheaper
Edward Hugh and Marcelo Rinesi write in The Straits Times:
Andressen on What's New
Marc Andressen in an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle talks about the next new things in the form of "digital industries":
Emerging Technologies
| PermaLink
| Comments (2)
Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl Posted by Pastrami SandwichBuy Cialis
The Second Tech Boom
David Kirkpatrick (Fortune) takes a look at the emerging, new economy - one where technology is embedded in all that we do, and efficiency and productivity are the norm rather than the exception.
Remail
Remail is an IBM Research project to reinvent email to address three critical issues facing email:
Wonder how this compares to Chandler.
OpenRISC 1000
Slashdot has a pointer to OpenRISC 100, an open-source design of a system-on-chip, designed by Flextronics. "It is a 32-bit general-purpose microcontroller implemented on UMC 0.18um targetting embedded applications with maximum clock frequency of 160MHz." Am wondering: could this be used as a base to design the thin client - the USD 50 client (excluding monitor) that I'd love to see happen?
Thin Client-Thick Server
| PermaLink
| Comments (2)
Buy Meridia
TECH TALK: My Mental Model: …requires Ecosystems…
One of the things I have realised – with the expense of some time and cost – that it is not good enough to just have an innovative product or service. When one is targeting nonconsumption markets, just solving one problem may not be good enough. Let me explain with an example, and then we will get to the deeper learnings. When I started thinking about the SME growth problem, my initial belief was that what they needed was a low-cost eBusiness software – just like the big enterprises. But as I looked deeper, I realised that even if I created the “mini-ERP” software, there were not enough computers in the enterprise to ensure they made optimal use of it, and more importantly, for me to make money – at that time, the plan was to rent the software to them because they would probably not have interested in (or would have been incapable of) making a single, large upfront payment. So, now, I had to look at both the computer penetration and enterprise software problems. As time elapsed, we created a solution for the computer penetration problem – thin clients, server-centric computing, open-source software and remote management. We also developed an integrated server-software solution, to ensure that the backend infrastructure for messaging and security would be good. We were ready to sell our software to SMEs. So, who would do the selling? It was then that I understood that the problem was much bigger than I had anticipated as a technologist. There is no software distribution network for SMEs. There is no way for SMEs to be educated on the potential for using computers to their full potential. There is a channel, but it largely consists of hardware resellers, who are not sophisticated enough to talk to end-customers about the solutions for their business growth. The realisation slowly dawned on me that we needed an “SME Penetration Ecosystem”, rather than just the hardware-software bits that I was trying to put together. I could have saved myself quite some trouble had I been a student of economics or read Bhaskar Chakravorti’s book “The Slow Pace of Fast Change”. In economics, there is a concept of “co-ordination failure”. This is dealt with by Debraj Ray in his Economics textbook “Development Economics”. This insight came to me as I understood Atanu Dey’s plan for transforming rural India by setting up RISC (Rural Infrastructure and Services Commons) centres to concentrate investment from multiple infrastructure providers to create a common platform for service providers. The way to address the co-ordination failure in rural India was to bring all the entities together at the same time, and demonstrate how they could all benefit if each of them did exactly what their business was. Tomorrow: …requires Ecosystems… (continued) Related Entries: [All]TECH TALK: My Mental Model: The Road Ahead [December 19, 2003] TECH TALK: My Mental Model: …to Bridge Divides. [December 18, 2003] TECH TALK: My Mental Model: …with Local Distribution… [December 17, 2003] TECH TALK: My Mental Model: …of Integrated Solutions… (Part 2) [December 16, 2003] TECH TALK: My Mental Model: …of Integrated Solutions… [December 15, 2003]
Tech Talk
| PermaLink
| Comments (2)
The distribution network truly is not capable to handle or support distribution of knowledge products in the rural sector. My idea is that initially to tap the rural market, we adopt a franchise route, but not in the true sense. I am working on a small project in building an application for SME's and Rural Markets. What is this franchise methodology? Identify key CA firms [ CA's are looked ip on in rural areas as a confidante] who are the silent players in business decisions in these markets. [a fact i had seen when doing my rounds of financial services selling in rural maharashtra.] These CA's can run the application [Accounting/HR/Inventory etc.] in a "institute" like setup doing the work. We use a "known" entity to handle a consumer's business details exposing them to the advantages of the ERP or whichever application. It becomes a mini shared service platform. Say services all towns around it. Post this, the next step is to offload certain parts of the application to the consumer site and so on. The CA still remains as the financial advisor, but then migrates from a service provider to reseller. The rural market however has enough small consumers for the CA to still run his shared service. This way we build a network, educate/expose the rural market to the benefits of these applications. If you use your embedded systems in a MAN network in that town, we can deploy even further. AGD Buy Cialis |
This is article is really comparing apples to oranges. Human minds are not CPU's they are the software that runs on CPU's. Moore's law/theory/joke only applies to hardware. This is like saying that since you can hire singers/musicians in the third world to perform for pennies on the dollar, American music studios should be recording in the third world.
Posted by DreamThis article is really comparing apples to oranges. Human minds are not CPU's they are the software that runs on CPU's. Moore's law/theory/joke only applies to hardware. This is like saying that since you can hire singers/musicians in the third world to perform for pennies on the dollar, American music studios should be recording in the third world.
Posted by DreamOops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl
Posted by Pastrami Sandwich