Sunday, November 16, 2003
Search Engine Marketing
Fortune writes: "The hottest vehicles driving sales leads online are search engines—and small businesses found them first."
keyword bidding is evolving into part of an overall strategy using search engines as a lead generator. "Marketing on the Internet isn't about finding one method that works; it's an all-around process," says Mark Fiala, director of Internet operations for California Breath Clinics in Los Angeles, maker of the TheraBreath line of oral-care products. The $3 million business researched better, cheaper keywords, routed leads to specific product pages rather than the home page, and set up a way to solicit e-mail addresses to turn lookers into buyers. It reduced its monthly marketing tab from $8,000 to $4,000 while increasing its return on investment to some 275%.
The tricks of the trade: better bidding and developing a diversified strategy.
RISC Document
The complete RISC document, co-authored by Atanu Dey and Vinod Khosla, is available for download from Vinod Khosla's webpage. It is a longish document, but gives a fascinating perspective into what is needed for the economic transformation of rural India. It is what we are working to implement in Deeshaa.
Ozzie on Longhorn's WinFS
Ray Ozzie writes:
In a pre-WinFS world, each application has managed its own "documents" and "records" and "collections" as an island unto itself - each with its own indexing and interaction mechanisms, each with its own solution-building mechanisms. Good 'nuf. But in a WinFS world - just like in a Web Services world - we have the opportunity to explore what would happen if we dared to "deconstruct and refactor" our concepts of traditional client-side applications into a mesh of separately-built application components that "meet" at the level of common persistent objects and relationships.
Imagine what a traditional PIM might look like if it were possible to build it in a modular fashion, with each modules' underlying object schemas, store, and methods exposed as standards so that others could build upon them? Imagine building custom domain-specific client-side CRM/SFA solutions that might leverage these common standards. Imagine the deconstruction and refactoring of traditional desktop applications so that higher-level domain-specific applications and solutions could be built from components currently embedded in larger integrated packages. Imagine what "content management" might become in an era where collections of objects can be created, retrieved, cached, replicated, published in conjunction with service-oriented systems, yet one in which a variety of content creation and manipulation applications can effectively leverage common storage and synchronization mechanisms.
Adds Ozzie: "There are two significant factors working in favor of the future of the rich client: storage and communications."
Two interesting experiences/observations I have had while working on Search Engines and Keywords:
1. You need to select the keyword correctly. I worked on the keywords "Mathematics" & "Maths" for a site but found no traffic being generated. A little investigation showed Americans use Math; never Mathematics or Maths. Also realized users tend to go for the short forms of the words.
2. You need to know what the user will actually type. While working on the same site, I found we were not getting any hits for the keyword "Trigonometry". Basically most users were spelling it as Trignometry. So think of the possible spelling errors that people might commit while looking for your keyword.
In that sense, working on Keywords is fun. You never know what to expect, you never can take anything for granted. :)
Cheers,
Posted by DharDhar
you can get more keywords here http://inventory.overture.com here you can find how many keywords peoples typing in per months time period. you can get and idea if this search engines have this much traffic then how much will be in google
i am working on one project on search engines
on http://www.info-sys.org I have given a list of more than 3000 search engines list from 211 countries. if we can integrate these 3000 search engines each other through any outsider software algoritham then we can make a nice site on search engine.
i know this is not that much easy idea. but if dmoz.org type site can make good directory site then i think we can also make any good site like this
Posted by yogesh ahireKeywords placement on search engines is interesting, but before anyone wants to play the game well, they would be adviced to learn the other areas of website optimisations, as it could be very expensive on the long run! An analysis of those who paid for keyword placement shows that they normally withdraw from the scheme after two months, after finding out they there is really no short cut to attracting new customers!
Posted by terry