|
Thursday, February 20, 2003
Groupware
ServerWatch has a nice round-up of the state of Groupware and Collaboration. "Groupware and collaboration is an extremely elastic category. The terms, in essence, refer to anything electronic that helps people work together efficiently. The space can include e-mail, calendaring, instant messaging, audio and video conferencing, document repositories of different types, content management, bulletin boards, and voice services." Microsoft and IBM control 60% of the market. Microsoft will be launching Titanium later this year, while IBM has its Notes/Doomino platform. A summary of the trends as mentioned in the article:
Messaging is a space we are in, too - with our MailServ solution. It does not yet have groupware and collaboration features, but its something we are working on.
WiFi and Cellular on New Mobile Phones
Writes WSJ: "New Wi-Fi phones, expected to be available world-wide within the next 12 months, would allow users to connect to Wi-Fi networks, which can be 100 times as fast as even relatively speedy cellular-data connections. The phones could be used for everything from e-mailing to surfing the Web and downloading music, video or big files such as PowerPoint presentations, and making voice calls to boot. When the devices aren't in the vicinity of Wi-Fi links, which are increasingly found in homes, offices, airports and cafes, users could switch over to traditional cellular services." These WiFi cellphones are expected to cost USD 500 and more. Samsung's Nexio (USD 1,125) device connects to both WiFi and cellular networks. Why in the world would anyone need 3G? Related Entries: [All]
Telecom
| PermaLink
| Comments (1)
It would be interesting to see if Wi-Fi technology will improve the value-prop of high-end PDAs and "Converged" phones in India. Personally, I dont thin so. In doing a quarterly market tracker for SmartPhones and PDAs, I have used not counted them as a market driver till 2005 at least.
CPU Performance
Tom's Hardware has a report discussing CPU performance over the years. This is how Intel's CPUs have progressed:
Looking at this from our "thin client" viewpoint, if we are to use old PCs, then, in theory, we could use CPUs dating back to March 1994 (Pentium 75 and higher). So, in effect, even 9-year-old PCs can be used as the low-cost desktops in the thin client-thick server computing environment.
Emergent Democracy
Joi Ito connects many ideas together (blogs, emergence, strength of weak ties, social networks, trust). His conclusions:
Linux Desktop: Win4Lin
Jim Curtin (CEO of NeTraverse) discusses the Linux Desktop and his company's product (Win4Lin), which runs Windows on Linux. Some comments:
An alternate idea to Win4Lin is "Lin-on-Win". What I have been thinking is that the world is full of Windows desktops (either legally purchases software or pirated). Trying to get people to switch completely to Linux - atleast in the case of existing users - is quite disruptive, and is naturally opposed by users. Instead, think of a solution where the Linux desktop becomes an application on the Windows desktop (through vnc or other alternatives). Wean the user away slowly with some applications. For example, start by promising virus-free email on the Linux desktop - this will mean moving mail and files to a Linux server. Next setp, get OpenOffice on the Linux desktop. This way, the users still have Windows as their primary desktop, but key applications (mail, files, office suite) are moved on to Linux. Once they get more comfortable with the Linux environment, Windows can be replaced completely and the users won't notice as much (as long as the Windows apps they need can be supported or migrated).
RSS Subscriptions
John Robb gives his view (one which I agree with) on the value of RSS feeds, after finding that he has subscribed to 115 feeds:
On a related note, this is the comment made by Jeremy Allaire in relation to Jon Udell's Team Blog comment:
I believe that a "new desktop" can be designed around the microcontent client, built around a digital dashboard and news readers, with the backend integrated with enterprise events, available via RSS. Will take this discussion up in a forthcoming Tech Talk series.
TECH TALK: The Rs 5,000 PC Ecosystem: Homes
The question that has puzzled me for some time is as follows: Why aren’t more people in India buying computers for their homes? I am sure they recognise the importance of computers, especially for their children. And yet, less than a million PCs are being bought for homes. (The number is probably lower: a total of 2 million PCs will be sold in India this year). Availability of cheap consumer financing means that one can take home a PC for Rs 1,000 per month (payable for 36-42 months). And yet, home sales are not skyrocketing. Why is that? Is it that people find the Rs 1,000 monthly installment high? Or is that there are other factors – electricity issues (lack of available of reliable power across India), space issues (where do they keep it in small homes), software issues (where do I get – pirate – relevant software), Internet access costs (which can run upwards of Rs 500 per month for as little as 30 minutes of daily dial-up access). My belief is that one of the key issues in this conundrum is the total cost of ownership. Computers are believed to become obsolete in 3-4 years. Which means, that from the home user’s point of view, the monthly outflow for a connected computer is at least Rs 1,500. This is not a small figure for most Indian families. The price point for mass market adoption is, according to me, no more than Rs 500-700 per month. Or, put another way, the upfront cost should be no more than Rs 5,000 and monthly outflow should be about Rs 250-500 per month. At those price points, it is comparable to the cost of two other networked devices – the TV and the cellphone. So, why not apply the same model to the computer to drive mass market adoption? The Rs 5,000 PC (5KPC) can do just that. It needs a network to come alive and be useful, just like the TV needs the cable network and the cellphone needs the GSM/CDMA network. So, to make the 5KPC an economic reality, it means that the service operator has a three-year revenue base of a minimum of Rs 9,000 (36 months at Rs 250 each month) to provide for the loaded thick server costs, software and wireless connectivity. The thick server loading is about Rs 2,000 per 5KPC in enterprises – this will probably be the same homes, since even though usage is not that high, it is likely to be bursty, especially early in morning and late evenings. Wireless connectivity using WiFi can probably be provided for Rs 3,000 (cost of equipment – cards and access point) since there are no spectrum costs. These costs will probably halve in the next year. That leaves a budget of Rs 4,000 for software and operations. Considering that all the software used is going to be open-source and based on Linux, it should be possible to put a solution together within these limits. What this does not take account is the upside. And that is where the 5KPC scores. The 5KPC desktop can be remotely controlled by the operator, who can now sell “icon space” to banks and other service companies for a small fee per user. Everytime the home user starts the 5KPC, these icons (and therefore the brands) will be visible. It is akin to how cellphone companies can provide links to value-added services which are “one-click” away on the cellphone. In addition, as desktops proliferate at home, it now becomes possible for the nighbourhood stores to set up relationships with consumers in the neighbourhood through RSS (Rich Site Summary) feeds which provide information on what’s new. RSS feeds are based on XML and can be automatically picked up by special programs (RSS Aggregators and News Readers), based on the user’s subscriptions. For years, people have talked of interactive TV with set-top boxes. That hasn’t happened. The computer is the ideal interactive device. In effect, the 5KPC will create a whole new ecosystem of interactive services targeted at home users. The 5KPC is what can make the vision of “a connected computer accessible to every family” a reality. Tomorrow: Moreover Related Entries: [All]
|
I don't see instant messaging falling out this way (according to Patricia Seybold Group). IM seems to be used as a background conversation tool where the organization can converse informally with no storage needed and no real accountability. It fills the gap where people can "talk." In the old days we used to use email for conversations but suddenly email was "formalized" and now it's "be careful what you write, it's on the record." IM is most useful (as I'm seeing it used) when there is no accountability with it. If you need "proof" then go back to email. I'm also seeing the use of Weblogs supplanting some of the need for "full-featured collaborative applications."
Posted by Steve Gall