|
Saturday, June 1, 2002
Corporate Blogging
An article in the Seattle Times on how companies can use blogs for marketing and promotion.
In a sense, that is what Emergic.org (this blog) is doing. Talking about our ideas and work in public. This is, I think, increasingly going to be path adopted by smaller companies with limited marketing budgets. Think of it as MicroMarketing.
United Colours of Linux
Recently, four Linux companies decided to combine their versions of Linux into a common distribution called UnitedLinux. One of them is Caldera. News.com has a QA with Caldera's CEO. His view: "There are two major reasons as to why Linux is not being more widely adopted in the enterprise: certification of business applications and fragmentation of the code base. We believe that with this announcement we have solved both of these. With the four Linux companies involved, we get a global perspective, we have a strong global network, but more importantly, we have a single product that can be certified one time. " I think one of the confusing things about Linux is definitely the multiplicity of versions. As developers, one has to make a bet, because there are constant upgrades and its difficult to keep up with versions of multiple vendors. That said, the companies should have just adopted Red Hat's base as the standard: Red Hat has over 50% of the market and has won. No point trying to make one more distribution. United, taken to the extreme. The enemy is Windows, not Red Hat. The opportunity for Linux is on the desktop in the emerging markets of the world. Few US or Europe based companies seem to get this. Its the new users who can easily adopy Linux -- migration of Windows users is not easy. Forget the first 500 million, focus on the next billion who cannot afford to pay for Microsoft Windows and Office.
Software
| PermaLink
| Comments (1)
A lot of efforts of Linux Distributors seem to in the area of Linux on the desktop. The main strengths of Linux, as a genetically improved UNIX clone, can best be exploited in th server environment. This is also an area where major cost savings can be realised by companies. Linux on the desktop currently has no support in terms of remote management whereby multiple systems (sometimes 200-300 PCs) can be managed from a single location (For example: Intel LANDesk). This means that though larger companies may save something at the outset, in the long run, savings will be offset, and exceeded by costs of management(more manpower requirements). Also, we already have Mac OS X, a fine UNIX adaptation for the desktop which has proved itself to be even better than windows in performance and support for new technology standards. So coming back to my question ... why Linux for the desktop? whatever for? Posted by Clinton Goveas
Extreme Programming
An article in Salon on a new methodology in programming -- XP, or extreme programming:
Definitely worth trying out!
Software
| PermaLink
| Comments (3)
I love XP! It is refreshingly simple in concept and logical in its execution. Furthermore, it gives an alternative to Rational's RUP methodology which more or less revolves around its Rose UML suite. However, in my implementations I have always had to adapt XP as it is something that could not be used as is. The major problem was in getting developers to take ownership of the (unit) testing process. XP is also not for all projects; just small to medium ones. See the XP web site for further details: Cialis Cialis |
Cialis
Posted by PharmacyMeridia
Levitra
Viagra Alternative
Order Viagra
Buy Viagra
Order Viagra
Ambien
Cialis
Posted by Links > MedicinesViagra
Viagra
Levitra
Cheap Viagra
Ambien
Viagra
Generic Viagra